Posted February. 29, 2016 07:05,
Updated February. 29, 2016 07:13
"The critical variable for the cut-off was 'silent stigmatization' by intimate relationships," said a reelected member of the Minjoo Party on the 10 members who were recently cut off from nomination due to the "low 20 percent cut-off."
The Elective Office Evaluation Board conducted an evaluation of local lawmakers based on campaign pledges (35 percent), election contributions (10 percent), local activities (10 percent), a 360 degree evaluation (10 percent), and public surveys (35 percent). Only two areas were evaluated related to proportional representation (PR) lawmakers: legislative activities (70 percent) and the 360 degree evaluation (30 percent).
The board divided lawmakers based on their election degree and their standing committee, and let fellow lawmakers evaluate them with a grade from A to D. One newly-elected member revealed, "To be honest, how well one would know about their colleagues that they can give them a grade from A to D? We just give a D to whom other lawmakers would give a D."
"Rep. Baek Gun-ki, who is a former army general and now a conservative PR member, got a top score on legislative activity but a very low score on his 360 degree evaluation," a key figure of the party stated. "No incentive was given to those who once took a local commissioner position among PR members."
Some point out that for the same reason the names in the cut-off list are lawmakers who were at the center of rumors during an evaluation at the end of last year.